This act would give the United States of America control of 40% of the worlds population, nearly 60% GDP globally, and some of the fastest growing economies, merely by signing this agreement with the Asia-Pacific Region.
“The proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership FTA would be a significant FTA for the United States and could eventually become the platform for a broader Asia-Pacific free trade area, an area that encompasses 40% of the world’s people and over half of global production.” (Doc. No. international trade and finance analysis-7-5700 at 33 (2013). Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Countries: Comparative Trade and Economic Analysis Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance www.crs.gov)
The negotiators behind the United States of America’s government have a primary source of motivation created by the significant difference within the trades of this area. Asia-Pacific economies made up over 62% of market trade, whilst the US made up 40%.
The US trades with “services, unlike goods, are typically intangible (e.g., financial, legal, accounting), making their trade more complex to measure than tracking a shipping container from location A to location B.” (Doc. No. international trade and finance analysis-7-5700 at 33 (2013). Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Countries: Comparative Trade and Economic Analysis Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance www.crs.gov)
The same motivations of envious power in the US folds into Australia, Canada, Mexico, Japan, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand, Chile, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei and other largely advancing economies across the world to participate in said agreement.
“A main focus of the proposed TPP FTA, billed as a “21st century” agreement, is emerging issues in international trade. The United States, in which services provide 83% of non-agricultural jobs and over 65% of GDP, is considered to be particularly competitive in this sector.” (Doc. No. international trade and finance analysis-7-5700 at 33 (2013). Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Countries: Comparative Trade and Economic Analysis Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance www.crs.gov)
It is also a backdoor way of ensuring that the citizens of these agreements who would directly have their right removed to understand what contents are being contained and shipped overseas for direct consumption (since they intend to take away approved labeling needs), as well as the genetically modified, destructive molecular invitation, that will infest those supplies will make the Monsanto corporation a monopoly of agricultural trade.
bilateral investment treaties (BITs) or FTAs.” (Doc. No. international trade and finance analysis-7-5700 at 33 (2013). Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Countries: Comparative Trade and Economic Analysis Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance www.crs.gov) Any investment treaties should be based off of public interest, due to the difficulty in other means influenced in cooperation, understanding, abiding and up keeping of said laws.
“Non-self-execution represents the best method for reconciling treaty making with the processes of public lawmaking that are imposed by the text and structure of the Constitution.” (Yoo, John C. Treaties and Public Lawmaking: A Textual and Structural Defense of Non-Self-Execution. Publication.)
American citizens are allowing yet another fraternizing indent deconstruct their constitution by allowing such a treaty or bill to pass without their full cooperation, knowledge, and input.
“In addition to trading services across international borders, countries also provide services to foreign residents by establishing a commercial presence in local markets.” (Doc. No. international trade and finance analysis-7-5700 at 33 (2013). Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Countries: Comparative Trade and Economic Analysis Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance www.crs.gov)
Citizens of other countries are directly allowing American rule to interrupt their freedoms by submitting to the same restrictions and legislations in your every day life. “As domestic and international matters intermix, more pressure will be placed on the American public lawmaking system, which has developed distinct processes to address the regulation of domestic affairs and the making of international agreements.” (Yoo, John C. Treaties and Public Lawmaking: A Textual and Structural Defense of Non-Self-Execution. Publication.)
“TPP trade is not currently covered by an FTA. Due to the great diversity among the TPP participants, there may be challenges in achieving a comprehensive and high standard agreement. TPP countries vary in terms of population, economic development, and geography” (Doc. No. international trade and finance analysis-7-5700 at 33 (2013). Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Countries: Comparative Trade and Economic Analysis Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance www.crs.gov) If all of the participants function in such diverse structures, then why should we reinforce those entities with such malicious force of freedom less conformity.
We still have time to prevent such adversity in opposition, we can vote with direct action, peaceful action, petitions, but we can directly affect this with our vote and paying with our personal trading, purchasing, and objective standards of merchandise.
Below is a table introducing the amount of private agreements (BITs) within each demographic area of ensured interest. The increased numbers represent areas that have lost that listed amount of citizen and public freedom in their vote or opinion of their basic necessities.
In conclusion this would detain the rights of individuals involved in any agricultural, economical, industrial, marketing, or consuming realm of organic procedure throughout the listed economies impacted by this trade agreement and more to come.
http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/statis_e.htm
https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42344.pdf
http://www.law.berkeley.edu/faculty/yooj/courses/forrel/reserve/Treaties.htm
http://aids2012.msf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/TPP-Issue-Brief-IAC-July2012.pdf